Search
Read as Estonia · governance · all of Estonia
Estonia
- Rule of Law - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202582.25ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Rule of Law - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20251.43ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Regulatory Quality - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202579.09ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Political Stability - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202581.16ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Control of Corruption - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202581.06ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20251.37ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Political Stability - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20250.89ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20251.64ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Government Effectiveness - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202583.04ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Voice and Accountability - Governance scoreWorld Bank · 1996–202582.38ordinal scale (0-100) · 2025
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20251.50ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimateWorld Bank · 1996–20251.34ordinal scale (-2.5 to +2.5) · 2025
- Health care expenditure by function: Governance and health system and financing administrationEurostat · 2003–202426.57Euro per inhabitant · 2024
- Expenditure for selected health care functions by health care providers: Governance and health system and financing administrationEurostat · 2003–202426.57Euro per inhabitant · 2024
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Million euroEurostat · 2021–2025662.90Million euro · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Million euroEurostat · 2021–20251758.80Million euro · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Million units of national currencyEurostat · 2021–2025662.90Million units of national currency · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Million units of national currencyEurostat · 2021–20251758.80Million units of national currency · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · 2021–20251.60Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · 2021–20254.20Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Million euroEurostat · 2023–2025119.60Million euro · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Million units of national currencyEurostat · 2023–2025119.60Million units of national currency · 2025
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · 2023–20250.30Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) · 2025
Datasets 30
- Rule of Law - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherRule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Rule of Law - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherRule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- Regulatory Quality - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherRegulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Political Stability - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherPolitical Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Control of Corruption - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherControl of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherRegulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- Political Stability - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherPolitical Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherControl of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- Government Effectiveness - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherGovernment Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Voice and Accountability - Governance scoreWorld Bank · OtherVoice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherGovernment Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimateWorld Bank · OtherVoice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.
- CPIA property rights and rule-based governance ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance criterion assesses the extent to which economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. It encompasses three dimensions: (a) legal framework for secure property and contract rights, including predictability and impartiality of laws and regulations; (b) quality of the legal and judicial system, as measured by independence, accessibility, legitimacy, efficiency, transparency, and integrity of the courts and other relevant dispute resolution mechanisms; and (c) crime and violence as an impediment to economic activity and citizen security.
- Health care expenditure by function: Governance and health system and financing administrationEurostat · HealthEurostat table hlth_sha11_hc. Health care expenditure by function: Governance and health system and financing administration (Euro per inhabitant).
- Expenditure for selected health care functions by health care providers: Governance and health system and financing administrationEurostat · HealthEurostat table hlth_sha11_hchp. Expenditure for selected health care functions by health care providers: Governance and health system and financing administration (Euro per inhabitant).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Million euroEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation (Million euro).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Million euroEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure (Million euro).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Million units of national currencyEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation (Million units of national currency).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Million units of national currencyEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure (Million units of national currency).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Gross fixed capital formation (Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on defence, Total general government expenditure (Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Million euroEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure (Million euro).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Million units of national currencyEurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure (Million units of national currency).
- Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure, Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)Eurostat · Public SectorEurostat table gov_ev. Expenditure variables supporting the implementation of the EU economic governance framework: Expenditure on national cofinancing of programmes funded by the EU, Total general government expenditure (Percentage of gross domestic product (GDP)).
- CPIA debt policy ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Debt Policy and Management criterion assesses whether the country’s debt management strategy is conducive to ensure medium-term debt sustainability and minimize budgetary risks. The criterion covers: (a) the extent to which external and domestic debt is contracted with a view to achieving/maintaining debt sustainability; and (b) the effectiveness of debt management functions (including the degree of coordination between debt management and other macroeconomic policies, the effectiveness of the debt management unit, and the existence of a debt management strategy and of a legal framework for borrowing).
- CPIA fiscal policy ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This CPIA fiscal policy criterion assesses the quality of the fiscal policy in its stabilization and allocation functions. The stabilization function deals with achieving macroeconomic policy objectives in conjunction with coherent monetary and exchange rate policies—smoothing business cycle fluctuations, accommodating shocks. The allocation function is concerned with the appropriate provision of public goods. The criterion pays attention to public expenditure composition, including, for example, the provision of public infrastructure and agriculture related public goods and services that support medium-term growth.
- CPIA gender equality ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA gender equality rating criterion assesses the extent to which the country has enacted and put in place institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that: (a) promote equal access for men and women to human capital development; (b) promote equal access for men and women to productive and economic resources; and (c) give men and women equal status and protection under the law. For the human capital development dimension, the focus is on primary completion and access to secondary education, access to health care during delivery and to family planning, and adolescent fertility rate. For access to economic and productive resources, the focus is on labor force participation, land tenure and property and inheritance rights. For Agency for change and equalization of status and protection under the law the focus is on individual and family rights and personal security (violence against women, trafficking, or sexual harassment) and political participation.
- CPIA financial sector ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The financial sector criterion assesses the policies and regulations that affect financial sector development. Three dimensions are covered: (a) financial stability; (b) the sector’s efficiency, depth, and resource mobilization strength; and (c) access to financial services.
- CPIA social protection ratingWorld Bank · Public SectorThe Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Social Protection criterion assesses government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people. Specifically it evaluates social protection (SP) and labor policies, namely those engaged in risk prevention by supporting savings and risk pooling through social insurance, protection against destitution through redistributive safety net programs and promotion of human capital development and income generation, including labor market programs. It also assesses the functioning of an SP system, including its effectiveness in a crisis and in providing arrangements and incentives to help beneficiaries to move from protection to promotion and prevention, including through interactions with private, informal means of SP. The criterion covers: (a) the overall SP system; (b) social safety net programs; (c) labor markets programs and policies, namely those aiming to promote employment creation and productivity growth while protecting core labor standards and ensuring adequate working conditions; (d) local service delivery and civil society participation in community development programs; and (e) pension and old age savings programs.
- IDA resource allocation indexWorld Bank · Public SectorThe CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score (the IDA resource allocation index) and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector).